Return to CRS Reports and Issue Briefs
Redistributed as a Service of the National Library for the Environment*
spacer.gif

 

Wheat, Feed Grains, Cotton, Rice, and Oilseeds
Provisions of the Enacted 1996 Farm Bill
 (See Endnote 1.)

Geoffrey S. Becker
Environment and Natural Resources Policy Division


 May 20, 1996
96-351 ENR
TEXT:

SUMMARY

 The "Agricultural Market Transition Act" (Title I of the 1996
farm law) ushers in a new system of price and income supports
for producers of wheat, feed grains, cotton, rice, and
oilseeds.  The new system offers a 7-year "production
flexibility contract" to producers with cropland enrolled in
the old grains or cotton programs in one of the past 5 years. 
Each contract will provide fixed, but declining, annual
payments that no longer are tied to market prices, to the
planting of a specific crop, or to annual land set-aside
requirements.  The new law earmarks about $37 billion through
2002, effectively creating, for the first time, an annual
limitation on such direct payments.  In addition, marketing
assistance loans are offered for most producers of wheat, feed
grains, rice, cotton, and oilseeds.



DESCRIPTION OF THE NEW PROGRAM

 For decades, federal law has required the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) to offer price and related support to
producers of nearly two dozen specified farm commodities. 
Through 1995, the primary price support tools for the crops
covered in this report--specifically wheat, feed grains (corn,
sorghum, barley, oats), rice, and cotton--were: (1) target
price deficiency payments, which increased when market prices
were low, and decreased when market prices were high; (2) crop
loans offered at harvest time; and (3) acreage reduction
programs, usually imposed as a condition of receiving support
payments and loans.  Support for oilseeds was limited to
loans.  The Department's Farm Service Agency, or FSA (formerly
the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service) each
year announced a "program" stipulating what and how much a
participating farmer could plant, and what his or her crop
benefits would be, based on statutory formulas.

 These programs generally derived their authority from three
permanent laws which are still on the books: the Agricultural
Adjustment Act of 1938 (P.L. 75-430); the Agricultural Act of
1949 (P.L. 81-439); and the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC)
Charter Act of 1948 (P.L. 80-806).  However, Congress has
frequently altered key provisions of these original laws--
usually through omnibus multi-year farm or budget bills--to
adjust to contemporary market conditions, control spending, or
address other policy concerns.

 The most recent legislation, the Federal Agricultural
Improvement and Reform (FAIR) Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-127),
again suspends most of the provisions of permanent law for
grains and cotton (section 171).  In their place, this new
farm law establishes, for the next 7 years, a new support
program under Title I, the "Agricultural Market Transition
Act," also known widely as "Freedom to Farm."  Following are
selected key provisions.

Production Flexibility Contracts 

 Under subtitle I-B, 7-year "production flexibility contracts"
are offered for fixed (but generally declining) annual
payments to producers with acreage that had been enrolled in
the old wheat, feed grains, upland cotton, and/or rice
programs in at least 1 of the past 5 crop years.  These
contracts replace target price payments.

 USDA has announced a one-time signup period for the
contracts, from May 20 through July 12, 1996; after that, only
producers with crop bases exiting the conservation reserve
program (CRP) can enroll.  Payments will be made in two
installments each year.

 Available funding.  Annual spending for the 7-year production
flexibility contracts is specified by section 113 of the law. 
The annual totals are allocated among crops based on the
following percentages, intended to reflect their previous
share of recent CCC outlays:  wheat, 26.26%; corn, 46.22%;
sorghum, 5.11%; barley, 2.16%; oats, 0.15%; upland cotton,
11.63%; rice, 8.47%.  The law also requires that the rice
allocation be supplemented by an additional $8.5 million
annually, beginning in FY1997.  This spending, which will
continue to be funded through the CCC, USDA's commodity
financing arm, is viewed as both a guarantee and a ceiling on
outlays (see table 1 for annual funding, by crop).

 Seven-year cumulative spending for commodity contracts is
locked in at $35.7 billion.  Provisions in the law require
that additional funding adjustments be made within the
individual crop allocations to compensate for past deficiency
payments made to, or repaid by, farmers.  The net result of
these adjustments is expected to add another approximately
$1.5 billion (over and above the $35.7 billion) to contract
funding.

 This upward adjustment in total available funding translates
into higher per-unit payment rates.  That effectively benefits
wheat, feed grain, and cotton farmers who, because crop prices
are now higher than anticipated a year ago, must repay the
advances they received on their projected 1995 deficiency
payments. (Unreturned advances will be deducted from
individuals' 1996 or 1997 contract payments).

 Previously, annual CCC outlays for income supports increased
or decreased depending upon market prices for supported crops. 
The new, fixed spending levels apply to contract payments
only; CCC annual outlays for crop loans, and for other
commodity programs and related activities, can continue to
rise and fall depending upon market and other conditions not
directly influenced by statute.


 Payments.  Section 114 specifies how payments will be
calculated, as follows:

--   USDA first will determine per-unit (per-bushel or per-
     pound) rates for each crop by (1) calculating, for each
     contract crop, total national production--set at 85% of
     total national contract acreage times farm program yield-
     -and then (2) dividing that amount into the total pot of
     money allotted annually for each of these crops.  Various
     estimates of average payment rates over the 7-year period
     have ranged as follows: 32 to 38 cents per bushel for
     corn; 37 to 45 cents per bushel for sorghum; 24 to 30
     cents per bushel for barley; 2.7 to 6 cents per bushel
     for oats; 61 to 67 cents per bushel for wheat; 7.1 to 8.1
     cents per pound for upland cotton; and $2.57 to $2.59 per
     100 pounds (cwt.) for rice.  These estimates are
     averages; payment rates generally decline each year over
     the life of the contract.  Final rates will be announced
     by USDA once officials determine the actual number of
     acres (national contract acreage) enrolled by U.S.
     farmers: fewer enrolled acres will mean higher rates, and
     vice versa.

--   Each farm's total annual payment for each contract
     commodity can then be calculated by multiplying the above
     payment rate times 85% of the "acreage base" times the 
     "program yield."  A farm's "acreage base" is the average
     acres planted or considered planted under the old program
     for the prior 5 years for wheat and feed grains, and the
     prior 3 years for upland cotton and rice.  "Program
     yields" (i.e., theoretical per-acre production under the
     old program) remain frozen at 1986 levels.  The total
     annual payment for those with multiple contract crop
     bases will be the sum of the calculations for each of the
     individual contract commodities.  An example of a
     contract calculation appears on page 6.

 Contract payments are tied to land, not individuals. 
Generally, section 111 stipulates that an individual must: (1)
own eligible farmland and assume all or part of the production
risk; (2) operate eligible farmland with a share-rent lease
with a landowner, who must sign the same contract; (3) operate
eligible farmland that is cash-rented (rules here vary
depending upon lease duration).  USDA must continue a policy
of protecting the interests of tenants and sharecroppers. 
Precisely how this will be accomplished--and whether, as some
critics predict, landowners will have a greater advantage over
tenants than in the past--remains to be seen.

 Planting flexibility.  Previously, each commodity program
participant's farm had a separate acreage base for each
program crop, and with some exceptions had to be planted to
the specified crop, but not in excess of the acreage base. 
The new law combines crop-specific bases into a single
contract acreage base for each farm.  Section 118 effectively
permits participating farmers to plant any combination of
wheat, feed grains, cotton, rice, oilseeds, or other crops on
the entire contract acreage (or put the land into a conserving
use).  Generally, fruits and vegetables cannot be planted on
contract acres; however, exceptions apply for USDA-specified
regions with a history of double-cropping contract commodities
with fruits or vegetables, and for individuals with a fruit
and vegetable planting history.  Unlimited haying and grazing
is permitted on all acreage, including contract acreage.  On
land outside of the contract acreage, there are no constraints
on the choice of crops.

 Section 111 explicitly requires that contract land be used
for agriculture-related activities, which would include
conservation uses, and that contract holders satisfy
conservation compliance and wetlands protection regulations. 
Farmers no longer are required to buy catastrophic crop
insurance to receive contract benefits, as long as they waive
eligibility for any disaster assistance (section 193).

 No annual acreage reduction.  Section 171 repeals USDA's
authority to impose annual cropland diversion requirements
(notably, an Acreage Reduction Program, or ARP) that shift
acreage out of crop production and into conserving uses.  ARPs
were imposed in the past to reduce acres eligible for payments
and thereby cut federal expenditures, and also to raise market
prices by reducing supplies.

Crop Loans

 Under subtitle I-C, nonrecourse marketing assistance loans,
and loan deficiency payments, continue to be available upon
harvest.  Section 132 generally requires that the rates per
bushel (or per pound) be set at 85% of average market prices
for the preceding 5 years, excluding the high and low years
(the upland cotton formula differs somewhat).  As table 2
indicates, maximum rates are specified for all crops.  Some
have minimums, and USDA has authority to lower wheat and feed
grain rates by as much as 10% to minimize surpluses.

 Eligibility for wheat, feed grains, upland cotton, and rice
loans is limited to those with production flexibility
contracts, although the entire farm's production (not just
contract acres) can qualify.  However, all oilseed and extra-
long staple (ELS) cotton is eligible at harvest, whether or
not it is grown on a contract farm (oilseeds and ELS cotton
are not considered "contract" crops eligible for payments).

 Loan repayment provisions.  Technically crop loans must be
repaid with interest within 9 months (10 months for cotton) of
borrowing or else the producer forfeits the collateral crop to
the government, which has "no recourse" other than to accept
it in lieu of repayment.  However, section 134 continues the
concept of "marketing loans," which enable the farmer to repay
the loan at a USDA-calculated rate that is intended to
approximate market prices.  If that repayment rate is below
the original USDA loan rate, the farmer captures the
difference as an inherent subsidy.  Moreover, loan deficiency
payments (equal to marketing loan gains) also are made to
eligible producers who choose not to take out loans (section
135).

 Under section 135, USDA will continue to calculate cotton and
rice loan repayment rates based on world market prices. 
Wheat, feed grains, and oilseeds repayment rates will be
calculated so as to minimize loan forfeitures and government
surplus acquisitions, and to encourage the movement of
commodities into private markets (likely to be the local
elevator or "posted county" price).  Under section 163,
interest rates that producers pay on new commodity loans are
increased by 1%.

 Section 171 suspends the farmer-owned reserve, which
permitted wheat and feed grain producers (under specified
surplus conditions) to extend their loans for up to an
additional 27 months or more.  Cotton loans no longer can be
extended for an extra 8 months; however, so-called cotton
"Step 2" payments, made whenever U.S. cotton prices are more
than 1.25 cents per pound above world prices, are continued,
subject to a 7-year spending limitation of $701 million
(section 136).

Annual Payment Limits

 Annual contract payments are limited by section 115 to no
more than $40,000 per "person" actively engaged in farming
(compared with $50,000 previously for target price deficiency
payments).  Marketing loan gains or loan deficiency payments
remain limited to a separate $75,000 per person.  There is no
change in the so-called "three entity rule" which permits a
person to receive up to half of the above annual limitations
on each of two more farms, effectively enabling total benefits
to reach $230,000 annually (a total of $80,000 in contract
payments and another $150,000 in marketing loan gains). 
Annual payment limitations apply to the sum of benefits for
all crops; there is not a separate cap for each crop.

Commission on 21st Century Production Agriculture

 Subtitle I-G establishes a Commission on 21st Century
Production Agriculture to conduct a comprehensive review of
U.S. agricultural conditions, the effects of the new market
transition contracts, and related issues, and to make
recommendations for future farm policy.  Initial and final
reports are due by June 1, 1998, and January 1, 2001,
respectively.

Determining a Producer's Annual Contract Payment: Example

 (Theoretical example is a farmer with 300 acres of corn base
and 450 acres of upland cotton base.)

CORN CONTRACT ACRES:                            300 acres
(1996 "acreage base"--average acres planted
or considered planted for the prior 5 years)

TIMES 85%:                                          255 acres

TIMES PROGRAM YIELD:                            120 bushels/acre
(frozen at 1986 level)

EQUALS PAYMENT QUANTITY:                        30,600 bushels

TIMES PAYMENT RATE:                             38 cents
(example; actual rate to be determined
by USDA)

EQUALS TOTAL PAYMENT FOR CORN:                  $11,628

COTTON CONTRACT ACRES:                          450 acres
(1996 "acreage base"--average acres planted
or considered planted for the prior 3 years)

TIMES 85%:                                          382.5 acres

TIMES PROGRAM YIELD:                            600 pounds/acre
(frozen at 1986 level)

EQUALS PAYMENT QUANTITY:                        229,500 pounds

TIMES PAYMENT RATE:                             8 cents
(example; actual rate to be determined
by USDA)

EQUALS TOTAL PAYMENT FOR COTTON:                $18,360

TOTAL ANNUAL CONTRACT PAYMENT:                  $29,988
(Producer can plant any crop or combination of crops, except
for restrictions on fruits and vegetables, on the entire 750
acres.  On any additional acres on the farm, there are no
restrictions.)



                          ENDNOTES

(1)  Sources include: the conference report accompanying the
1996 farm bill (H.R. 2854; H. Rept. 104-494); fact sheets
issued by the U.S. Department of Agriculture; various reports
by the Agriculture and Food Policy Center of Texas A&M
University; and recent CRS reports.

ReturnCRS Reports Home

National Library for the Environment National Council for Science and the Environment
1725 K Street, Suite 212 - Washington, DC 20006
202-530-5810 - info@NCSEonline.org
_
National Council for Science and the Environment